Lack of in-lens stabilization, plus the lack of IBIS for the a6300 (hence the need for using a tripod), means that I would miss a number of shot opportunities (vs going hand-held with the Sony).Īnother thing to take into account is that I am a total novice. insects and other small animals), I ll have to consider that if I was to go with the Voigtlander, I ll almost certainly have to use a tripod, as my hands don't tend to be very steady (at best!). In practice, and for someone like me who's primarily interested in macro (e.g. Voigtlander 110mm APO Macro: tad sharper (but how much?), better build quality, 3yr warranty Sony 90mm G Macro: AF, OSS, internal focusing Spec-wise, major prons/cons are easily distinguished, even by a novice such as myself i.e:
Now though, I m having a dilemma as to which I should pick - the Sony or the Voigtlander? Up until yesterday, I was almost certain that I m gonna go for the Sony G, having already eliminated Voigtlander's little brother (2/65 APO), as I wanted something that would at least achieve 1:1 magnification (as a proper macro lens should do in my opinion!) I ve done some extensive research over the subject - or should I say - not too extensive, as I ve missed the fairly recent Voigtlander 110mm Macro APO from my list of candidates. Some little night sky/star photography at times, which I always found fascinating to explore (still trying to get a glimpse of the Northern Lights!)Īnyhow, although my pockets are usually empty, I ve decided that something 'just good' isn't good enough for me - so I m looking to acquire a top lens for the job. I m over 70% macro (remaining 30% is mostly landscape during travel). So, within next few weeks, I ll be buying my first lens for my a6300.
0 kommentar(er)
